Curiosity Ought Not Range Beyond the Rule of Faith. Restless Curiosity, the Feature of Heresy.

Chapter XIV.—Curiosity Ought Not Range Beyond the Rule of Faith. Restless Curiosity, the Feature of Heresy.

So long, however, as its form exists in its proper order, you may seek and discuss as p. 250 much as you please, and give full rein to 1999 your curiosity, in whatever seems to you to hang in doubt, or to be shrouded in obscurity. You have at hand, no doubt, some learned 2000 brother gifted with the grace of knowledge, some one of the experienced class, some one of your close acquaintance who is curious like yourself; although with yourself, a seeker he will, after all, 2001 be quite aware 2002 that it is better for you to remain in ignorance, lest you should come to know what you ought not, because you have acquired the knowledge of what you ought to know. 2003 “Thy faith,” He says, “hath saved thee” 2004 not observe your skill 2005 in the Scriptures. Now, faith has been deposited in the rule; it has a law, and (in the observance thereof) salvation. Skill, 2006 however, consists in curious art, having for its glory simply the readiness that comes from knack. 2007 Let such curious art give place to faith; let such glory yield to salvation. At any rate, let them either relinquish their noisiness, 2008 or else be quiet. To know nothing in opposition to the rule (of faith), is to know all things. (Suppose) that heretics were not enemies to the truth, so that we were not forewarned to avoid them, what sort of conduct would it be to agree with men who do themselves confess that they are still seeking? For if they are still seeking, they have not as yet found anything amounting to certainty; and therefore, whatever they seem for a while 2009 to hold, they betray their own scepticism, 2010 whilst they continue seeking. You therefore, who seek after their fashion, looking to those who are themselves ever seeking, a doubter to doubters, a waverer to waverers, must needs be “led, blindly by the blind, down into the ditch.” 2011 But when, for the sake of deceiving us, they pretend that they are still seeking, in order that they may palm 2012 their essays 2013 upon us by the suggestion of an anxious sympathy, 2014 —when, in short (after gaining an access to us), they proceed at once to insist on the necessity of our inquiring into such points as they were in the habit of advancing, then it is high time for us in moral obligation 2015 to repel 2016 them, so that they may know that it is not Christ, but themselves, whom we disavow. For since they are still seekers, they have no fixed tenets yet; 2017 and being not fixed in tenet, they have not yet believed; and being not yet believers, they are not Christians. But even though they have their tenets and their belief, they still say that inquiry is necessary in order to discussion. 2018 Previous, however, to the discussion, they deny what they confess not yet to have believed, so long as they keep it an object of inquiry. When men, therefore, are not Christians even on their own admission, 2019 how much more (do they fail to appear such) to us! What sort of truth is that which they patronize, 2020 when they commend it to us with a lie? Well, but they actually 2021 treat of the Scriptures and recommend (their opinions) out of the Scriptures! To be sure they do. 2022 From what other source could they derive arguments concerning the things of the faith, except from the records of the faith?